PEER REVIEW PROCESS

All original contributions are reviewed by the editor and sent to two or more external reviewers as part of a double-blind peer review process (authors and reviewers are anonymous). The editor reserves the right to make editorial changes in all matters published in the Journal and cannot enter into correspondence about papers not accepted for publication. The editor has the final authority for the acceptance or rejection of any article.

PUBLICATION POLICY

SJCC Management Review Journal pursues to be the Journal where the search for knowledge co-exists with a sense of responsibility among the research community. The SJCC Journal’s primary motto is to publish articles from different contributors free of cost to promote the research community empowering through open access journal for all.

OPEN-ACCESS POLICY

SJCC Management Review Journal has open Journal Access to their publications. This means that our journals provide immediate open access for readers to all articles on the publisher’s website and another open-access website. The readers, therefore, are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to the full texts or use them for any other lawful purpose. The operations of the journals are self-funded by the institution.

SUBMISSION POLICY

Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, the publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the authorities responsible where the work was carried out.

WAIVER POLICY

We don’t charge any publication fee from authors to publish their articles. The authors will get one complimentary copy for their contribution to the journal.

PUBLISHING ETHICS

The publication of an article in a bi-annual peer-reviewed journal aims at a holistic and integral formation of researchers, fostering their respective networks of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

DUTIES OF EDITORS

The Editors will take publication decisions about the articles to be published on the journal website with fair play, confidentiality, and transparency based on the reviewer’s comments, revision recommendations and suggestions.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

The reviewers should follow the journal publication policy and also give their contribution towards Editorial decisions with Promptness, Confidentiality, Standards of Objectivity and Acknowledgement of Source.

DUTIES OF AUTHORS

The Authors should follow the prescribed journal format on the website before submitting the article for publication. The research contributed by the authors should be original and a plagiarism check should be performed before submission. The paper should not have been published elsewhere and if the paper consists of primary data, the questionnaire will be reviewed by the ethical committee. The author must acknowledge the source of the content and follow fundamental errors in published works.

PLAGIARISM DETECTION

he publisher and journals have a zero-tolerance plagiarism policy. We insist on a rigorous viewpoint on self-plagiarism.