Understanding Employee Engagement Using Norms of Reciprocity

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Md. Hassan Jafri

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate how social exchange and especially norms of reciprocity and its three dimensions (equivalence of exchange, immediacy of exchange and interest of parties in each other) are related to and influence employee engagement. Data were collected from 210 employees working at different levels from two corporations in Bhutan. Respondents were selected based on random sampling and include both male and female. A self-report questionnaire was used to measure all the variables of interests of the study. Regression analyses were carried out to analyze the obtained data. Results revealed that social exchange and especially norms of reciprocity significantly and positively explain variance in employee engagement. Out of the three dimensions of norms of reciprocity was found to be the most important factors. The implication of the researchfor the management of the organizations is that management should be sensitive towards the norms of reciprocity and especially it should try to provide inducement of employee's contribution as soon as possible if organization wants to have engaged workforce which is an important factor in employee's productivity and organizational performance.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Jafri, M. H. (2014). Understanding Employee Engagement Using Norms of Reciprocity. SJCC Management Research Review, 4(1), 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.sjccmrr.res.in/index.php/sjcc/article/view/79

References

  1. Accenture Institute for High Performance (2011). What Executives Really Need to Know about Employee Engagement, Research Report.
  2. Blau, P., M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York; Wiley.
  3. Center for Human Resource Strategy (2009). A New Framework of Employee Engagement. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
  4. Cropanzano, R., and Mitchell, M. S. (2005). 'Social exchange theory: An Interdisciplinary Review'. Journal ofManagement, 31, pp. 874-900.
  5. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71,500-507.
  6. Gouldner, H. P. (1960). 'Dimensions of organizational commitment'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, pp. 468-490.
  7. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, pp. 268-279.
  8. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies. In C. L. M. Keyes & J, Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 205 224), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  9. Lockwood, N. R. (2007). Leveraging Employee Engagement for Competitive Advantage: HP's Strategic Role. HR Magazine, March 2007.
  10. Macey, W. H. & Schneider, B. (2008). The Meaning of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1 (1), pp. 3-30.
  11. McLean Parks, J., & Smith, F. 1. (1998). 'Organizational contracting: A "rational" exchange?' In Halpem, J. J. and Stem, R. N. (Eds.), Debating Rationality: Nonrational aspects of organizational decision making. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (pp. 125-154).
  12. Miles, R.H. (2001). Beyond the age of Dilbert: Accelerating corporate transformations by rapidly engaging all employees. Organisational Dynamics, 29(4), 313-321.
  13. Mohapatra, M. & Sharma, B.R. (2010). Study of Employee Engagement and its Predictors in an Indian Public Sector Undertaking. Global Business Review, 11 (2), pp. 281-301.
  14. Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., Presaghi, F., & Ercolani, A. P. (2003). The personal norm of reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 17, pp. 251-283.
  15. Piening, E. P., Baluch, A. M., & Salge, T. O. (2013). The relationship between employees'
  16. perceptions of human resource systems and organizational performance: examining mediating mechanisms and temporal dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 926947.
  17. Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The drivers of employee engagement.lES Report No. 408. Brighton, UK: Institute for Employment Studies.
  18. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). 'Perceived organizational support: Areview of the literature'. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, pp. 698-714.
  19. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  20. Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age Economics. New York: Aldine.
  21. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21,600-619.
  22. Simon, D. H., Gomez, M. 1., McLaughlin, E. W., & Wittink, D. R. (2009). Employee attitudes, customer satisfaction, and sales performance: Assessing the linkages in US grocery stores. Managerial and Decision Economics, 30, pp. 27-41.
  23. Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-building Approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  24. Shore, L. M., and Tetrick, L. E. (1994). 'The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship'. In Cooper, C, and Rousseau, D. (Eds.), Trends in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1. Chichester, UK: Wiley, (pp. 91-109).
  25. Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Lynch, P., and Barksdale, K. (2006). 'Social and Economic Exchange: Construct Development and Validation'. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, pp. 837-867.
  26. Sparrowe, R. T., and Liden, R. C. (1997). 'Process and structure in leader-member exchange'. Academy of Management Review, 22, pp.522-552.
  27. Towers Perrin (September 2009). Employee engagement underpins business transformation. Retrieved on June 28, 2012 from http://www.towersperrin.com/tp/getwebcachedoc?country=gbr&webc=GBR/2008/2008 07/TP_ISR_July08.pdf
  28. United State Merit System Protection Board (2009, August, 24). Managing for Engagement: Communication, Connection and Courage. Retrieved on July 20, 2009, from http://www.mspb.gov/ sites/mspb/pages/MSPB%20Studies.aspx
  29. Van Rooy, D. L., Whitman. D. S., Hart, D & Caleo, S (2011) Measuring Employee Engagement During a Financial Downturn: Business Imperative or Nuisance? J Bus Psychol., 26, pp. 147-152.
  30. Wu, J. B.; Hom, P. W., Tetrick, L. E.; Shore, L. M.; Jia, L.; Li, C. & Song, L. J. (2006). The Norm of Reciprocity: Scale Development and Validation in the Chinese Context. Management and Organization Review, 2 (3), pp. 377-402.