Application of Free Cash Flow to Equity Model in Valuing Mahindra Group Companies: An Empirical Study

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 1, 2019
https://doi.org/10.35737/sjccmrr/V9/i1/2019/145547
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 9, Issue 1, June 2019

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Bhargav Pandya
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management Studies, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara - 390002. Gujarat

Abstract

The paper aims at applying the free cash flow to equity model in estimating the value of equity of the NIFTY Mahindra Group Index companies. It also serves to estimate a degree of under or overvaluation of these companies by comparing estimated value with the market price of the stocks. A sample consists of six companies covered in NIFTY Mahindra Group Index. Values of equity shares of these companies were estimated by applying free cash flow to equity model over a forecast period of five years ranging from 2019 to 2023. After the forecast period, the terminal value was found out by using the constant growth model. The values per share of sample companies were estimated as on March 31, 2018, and they were compared with market prices of these companies for the corresponding period. The results of the study revealed that five out of six companies were undervalued relative to the market price. Mahindra CIE Automotive Ltd was found to be highly undervalued across the sample representing 94.83% of undervaluation.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Pandya, B. (2019). Application of Free Cash Flow to Equity Model in Valuing Mahindra Group Companies: An Empirical Study. SJCC Management Research Review, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.35737/sjccmrr/V9/i1/2019/145547
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Bhandari, S & Adams, T. (2017). On the definition, measurement, and use of the free cash flow concept in financial reporting and analysis: a review and recommendations, Journal of Accounting and Finance, 17(1), 11-19.
  2. Damodaran, A. (2008). Growth and value: past growth, predicted growth and fundamental growth, accessed on March 23, 2019, retrieved from http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/papers/growthorigins.pdf
  3. Damodaran, A. (no date). Closure in valuation: estimating a terminal value, accessed on April 5, 2019, retrieved from http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/papers/termvalue.pdf
  4. Fernández, P. (2007). Valuing companies by cash flow discounting: ten methods and nine theories, Managerial Finance, 33(11), 853-876.
  5. Fernandez, P. (2017). Cash flow is a fact: net income is just an opinion, Accessed on March 20, 2019, retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=330540
  6. Fernandez, P. (2017). Company valuation methods, accessed on April 13, 2019, retrieved https://ssrn.com/abstract=274973
  7. Fernandez, P., Pershin, V. & Acín, I. (2018). Market risk premium and risk-free rate used for 59 countries in 2018: asurvey accessed on March 26, 2019, retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3155709
  8. Gardner, J., Mcgowan, C., & Moeller, S. (2009). Applying the free cash flow to equity valuation model to Coca-Cola, proceedings of the Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies, 14(1), 11-15.
  9. Penman, S. & Sougiannis, T. (1997). A comparison of dividend, cash flow, and earnings approaches to equity valuation, accessed on March 20, 2019, retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=15043
  10. Steiger, F. (2008). The validity of company valuation using discounted cash flow methods accessed on March 20, 2019, retrieved from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1003/1003.4881.pdf