Impediments in The Talent Development of Female Teachers: A Study in Selected State Universities of Karnataka, India
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Teachers are a talent community in the universe of education and universities are helm of higher education. Universities constitute an integral part in the development of any nation. The core purpose of a University is to impart education for life and this is done with the help offacilitators and they are the teachers or faculty. In the academic setup, students are taught the concepts of talent management and they implement it in the workplaces that they join or start. But the irony is that it is not fully implemented in universities even after knowing the results of its implementation.The present research is exploratory in nature and is an attempt to know the perceptions of female teachers, on the role of universities to manage talent i.e. the teacher talent in particular. The main objective of the study is to examine the reasons restricting the development of teacher talent. Thus this study is conducted in the selected state universities of Karnataka. Sample frame consists of 24 state universities. There are 11 general state universities and all eleven are taken for the study. The respondents for the present study are female teachers of all cadres, i.e. assistant professors, associate professors and professors from various streams and departments. The researchers have used the opinionnaire method of field survey research through questionnaires and personally interviewed the respondents.The developed framework and the data in the study provide a meaningful insight into developing teacher talent as teachers are one of the major talent communities in universities. The study gives an insight into many issues of developing teacher talent who in turn shall ignite the talent in students who will be the inputs to corporates.The factors restricting the teacher talent among female teachers are identified. Majority of the respondents in the study agree that development of their talent is restricted by the lengthy regulations and unclear rules of universities followed by the lethargic attitude of officials in the administrative section.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
How to Cite
D’ Souza, P. K., Pakkeerappa, P., & Sumitha, P. V. (2016). Impediments in The Talent Development of Female Teachers: A Study in Selected State Universities of Karnataka, India. SJCC Management Research Review, 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.sjccmrr.res.in/index.php/sjcc/article/view/33
References
- Berger, L. A. & Berger, D. R. (2004): The talent management handbook: creating organizational excellence by identifying, developing, and promoting your best /^eop/e, New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Butterfield, B. (2008). Talent management: Emphasis on action. Talent Management Strategies for Attracting and Retaining at the Best and the Brightest.CUPA-HR Journal, 59(1), 34-40
- Clunies, J. P. (2007). Benchmarking succession planning and executive development in higher education: Is the academy ready now to employ these corporate paradigms? Retrieved June 28, 2012 from http://www.academicleadership.org/emprical_research/BenchmarkingSuccessionPlanningDevelopmentinHigherEducation.sht m
- DeCenzo, D. A., & Robbins, S. P. (2007). Fundamentals of human resource management (9th Ed) Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
- Laff, M. (2006). Talent Management: From Hire to Retire. Alexandria. 60(11). 42-5
- Lynch, D. (2007). Can higher education manage talent? Retrieved June 11,2009 from http://www.insidehighered.eom/views/2007/l 1/27/lynch
- Sandler,S.(2005).ThetopHRissuesfor2005.HRfocus.82(l). 12-14.
- Schweyer, A. (2004). Talent Management Systems: Best practices in technology solutions for recruitment, retention and workforce planning. Tri-Graphic Printing.
- Uren, L. (2007). From talent compliance to talent commitment. Strategic HR Review. 6(3). 32-35.
- Wolverton, M., &Gmelch, W. H. (2002). College deans. Westport: Oryx.